This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Using a claims data-based sentinel system to improve compliance with clinical guidelines: results of a randomized prospective study

Authors
Javitt, J. C., Steinberg, G., Locke, T., Couch, J. B., Jacques, J., Juster, I., Reisman, L.
Journal
Am J Manag Care
Publication Date
2005 Feb
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
93-102
  • HIT Description: Decision support- Clinical guidelines More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To assess the effect of a sentinel system that scans administrative claims information and clinical data to detect and mitigate errors in care and deviations from best medical practices
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: Randomized controlled trial
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectiveness and quality, impact on efficiency, utilization, and costs
Summary:
  • Settings: Managed care plan headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio
  • Intervention: Treating physicians of intervention patients received clinical recommendations triggered by a computerized sentinel system.
  • Evaluation Method: claims data for costs of care, admissions and hospital LOS
  • Description: A rule-based artificial intelligence engine combined with an automated message generator that conveys clinical recommendations and supporting literature to MDs. Software coding was programmed in a combination of C++ and Visual Basic that draws data from an Oracle 8i-based data warehouse. Daily data inputs include insurance claims, hospital discharge and outpatient claims, laboratory claims and test results, and pharmacy claims.
  • Strategy: Issues for inclusion in the clinical rules engine were identified from national clinical trials, published guidelines, and FDA approved labeling by an in-house committee of MDs, working in consultation with health plan medical directors and a panel of medical consultants
  • Cost of HIT systems: Intervention costs $1.00 to $150 per member per month. ROI estimated at $8.07 per member per month
  • Healthcare Utilization: There were 19% fewer hospitalizations in the intervention group compared with the control group (p.001). Sub-analysis revealed that the entire difference in hospitalization was attributable to admission for cardiac and peripheral vascular disease.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Physicians of intervention patients complied with 24% of recommendations to add a drug compared to 17% for control patients (p0.007).
  • Changes in healthcare costs: Charges in the intervention group were $18.62 per member per month lower and paid claims were $8.07 per member per month lower.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.