This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., Strycker, L. A., King, D. K., Toobert, D. J., Rahm, A. K., Jex, M., Nutting, P. A.
Journal
Am J Manag Care
Publication Date
2006 Mar
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
137-45
  • HIT Description: Patient decision support / consumer health informatics More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To assess the influence of patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff on effectiveness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management program
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: Randomized controlled trial
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectiveness and quality
Summary:
  • Settings: Patients from Kaiser Permanente Colorado and from mixed-pager independent practices participated.
  • Intervention: Randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted tailored behavior change program versus a standard counseling with a general computerized health risk assessment (HRA).
  • Evaluation Method: Assessment of lab test; surveys about diet / activity
  • Description: A 30 to 40 minute computer-assisted tailored self-management (TSM) session with multimedia personlized feedback and goal-setting focused on patient selected strategies to improve physical activity and diet. The program generated a 2-page printout for the participant, a 1-page summary for the MD that included A1c and cholesterol data, and a detailed printout that the coach used to advise the patient. No information on what specific hardware or software was used.
  • Financial Context: 76% of invited Kaiser MDs participated in the project, compared with only 18% of non-Kaiser MDs invited (p0.01). Of the non-Kaiser MDs, those in large practices were more likely to participate than those in single-MD practices.
  • Healthcare Utilization: 41% of invited patients used the program
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Daily fat intake decreased nore with the intervention group.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.