This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Patient-carried card prompts vs computer-generated prompts to remind private practice physicians to perform health maintenance measures

Authors
Turner RC, Peden JG= Jr, O'Brien K
Journal
Arch Intern Med
Publication Date
1994 Sep 12
Volume
154
Issue
17
Pages
1957-60
  • HIT Description: Computer-generated prevention reminders. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Evaluate the efficacy of a computer-generated health maintenance prompt sheet for physicians.
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: RCT
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality
Summary:
  • Settings: The study was performed in private practice offices in rural eastern North Carolina, with 28 family practitioners and nine general internists participating.
  • Intervention: The efficacy of a computer-generated prompt sheet placed on the front of patients' charts was compared to with a patient-carried prompt card to remind physicians to perform selected health maintenance items.
  • Evaluation Method: Measure of screening rates of health maintenance items.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: There was a 7% increase in the performance of influenza vaccinations in the card group (17% vs. 24%) compared with a 6% increase in the computer group (20% vs. 26%). There was a 5% decrease in the performance of stool for occult blood in the card group (28% vs. 23%) compared with a 1% increase in the computer group (30% vs. 31%). There was an 11% decrease in the performance of pap smears in the card group (26% vs. 15%) compared with a 3% increase in the computer group (23% vs. 26%). There was a 2% decrease in the performance of breast examinations by the physician in the card group (35% vs. 33%) compared with a 3% increase in the computer group (30% vs. 33%). Finally, there was a 3% increase in the performance of mammograms in the card group (22% vs. 25%) compared with an 11% increase in the computer group (15% vs. 26%).
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.