This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Outpatient management of warfarin therapy: comparison of computer-predicted dosage adjustment to skilled professional care

Authors
White RH, Mungall D
Journal
Ther Drug Monit
Publication Date
1991 Jan
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
46-50
  • HIT Description: Computer drug dosing system. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Compare warfarin dosage-adjustments using a computer program to dosage-adjustments by a nurse-specialist.
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: RCT
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality, Impact on efficiency, utilization, costs
Summary:
  • Settings: The study was conducted at the Anticoagulation Clinic at the U C Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, and included 50 patients who were receiving chronic warfarin therapy and who required a dosage adjustment.
  • Intervention:  The accuracy of warfarin dosage-adjustments predictions using a computer program was compared to the accuracy of an experienced anticoagulation nurse-specialist.
  • Evaluation Method: Measures of accuracy of warfarin dosage adjustments, and final prothrombin time within 2 s.
  • Description: The computer program (ÒDrug CalcÓ) predicted the steady state warfarin dose by applying Bayesian forecasting techniques to a mathematical model of the dynamic pharmacologic response to warfarin.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: There was no significant difference between the computer program and the anticoagulation nurse-specialist and the mean of the absolute value of the differences between final prothrombin times and target prothrombin times, nor was there a difference in the proportion of patients who had a final prothrombin time within 2 s of the target prothrombin time.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.