This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Improving influenza vaccination performance in an HMO setting: the use of computer-generated reminders and peer comparison feedback

Authors
Barton MB, Schoenbaum SC
Journal
Am J Public Health
Publication Date
1990 May
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
534-6
  • HIT Description: Computerized reminders. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Assess the effectiveness of computer-generated reminders and peer comparison feedback for improving influenza immunization performance.
  • Years of study: 1983-1987
  • Study Design: Pre-Post
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality
Summary:
  • Settings: A health maintenance organization in the Boston area, Massachusetts. A group of members older than age 65, a high-risk group under age 65, and a group of diabetic members who had not been subject to the reminders (compared to a group who had been covered by the program) participated in the study.
  • Intervention: The prevention program included a postcard reminder to members at high risk for complications of influenza, a computer-generated reminder to the physician at the time of any primary care visit by high-risk patients, performance feedback to chiefs of service, and, retrospective feedback to each physician comparing his/her performance with that of the other physicians.
  • Evaluation Method: Measure of influenza immunization rates during the 1984-1987 flu seasons
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: A significant increase in vaccination rates was not achieved until physician feedback was added to the program during the third flu season. Vaccination rates were increased in those diabetic members who received reminders (55.9% compared to 27% in the no-reminder group).
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.