This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Improved compliance with quality measures at hospital discharge with a computerized physician order entry system

Authors
Butler, J., Speroff, T., Arbogast, P. G., Newton, M., Waitman, L. R., Stiles, R., Miller, R. A., Ray, W., Griffin, M. R.
Journal
Am Heart J
Publication Date
2006 Mar
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
643-53
  • HIT Description: Computerized Provider Order Entry More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To assess the effect of CPOE discharge tools on quality measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF)
  • Years of study: 2001-2003
  • Study Design: Pre-post
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectiveness and quality
Summary:
  • Settings: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • Intervention: CPOE for discharging patients with AMI or CHF
  • Evaluation Method: Compared outcomes (prescription of beta-blockers, aspirin use, ejection fraction determination, discharge instructions, counseling) from pre-CPOE period with those after CPOE implementation
  • Description: CPOE included point-of-care reminders for the specific quality measures and a prescription writer function. After the discharge tool was completed, letters customized for the patient were printed.
  • Interoperability: Operates with existing electronic medical records system
  • Strategy: CPOE system development was an iterative process. Changes could occur weekly based on feedback from a complaint button, compliance requirements, etc.
  • Barriers: There was confusion between providers and coders on criteria used to assign primary discharge diagnoses. Also, there was no regular feedback on quarterly results; such feedback could have led to increased adoption of the system.
  • Cost of Implementation: Implementation cost $37,391; this reflects only incremental costs of implementing the tool on an already extensive established network and hospital computer infrastructure including a biomedical informatics department.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Smoking cessation counseling increased from 1% to 43% of smokers with CHF and from 21% to 62% of smokers with AMI. Discharge instructions increased from 3% to 56% of CHF patients. The proportion of patients who received discharge prescriptions did not change.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.