This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system

Authors
Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O
Journal
Scand J Prim Health Care
Publication Date
1999 Mar
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
  • HIT Description: Electronic health record and computerized decision support with guidelines. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Assess a computer-based clinical decision support system with guidelines to treat hypertension.
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: RCT
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality
Summary:
  • Settings: General practices in Sor- and Nord-Trondelag counties in Norway, with 380,000 inhabitants participated in the study.
  • Intervention: A group of health centers using a computer-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) with clinical guidelines for hypertension (doctors received baseline registrations with information of how they treated their own patients) were compared to a control group.
  • Evaluation Method: Measures of patient outcomes (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, body mass index, risk score for myocardial infarction, and differences in fractions of smokers).
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Significant group difference in favor of intervention group: diastolic blood pressure 1 mmHg (95% CI -1.89, -0.17). Also, significant baseline difference in systolic blood pressure in favor of control group of 2.7 mmHg (95% CI 1.0, 4.5) had been reduced to 1.2 mmHg (95% CI -0.6, 3.0) after intervention. There were no significant differences between the groups for the rest of the outcomes.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.