This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Evidence for electronic health record systems in physical therapy

Authors
Vreeman, D. J., Taggard, S. L., Rhine, M. D., Worrell, T. W.
Journal
Phys Ther
Publication Date
2006 Mar
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
434-46; discussion 446-9
  • HIT Description: Electronic health record (EHR) More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To assess the effectiveness of electronic health records for physical therapy patients
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: Systematic Review
  • Outcomes: Other
Summary:
  • Settings: Physical therapy programs in hospitals and outpatient settings
  • Intervention: Any EHR for physical therapy patients that contained the core functionality of health information and at least two other core functionalities
  • Evaluation Method: Systematic review. Quantitative description of results of 13 studies of 7 EHR systems.
  • Description: Systems varied Hardware systems ranged from a card-oriented mainframe computer to modern PCs on a network.
  • Interoperability: Varied by system
  • Strategy: Varied by system
  • Facilitators: End-user input in system development, adequate staff training, and incorporating workflow analysis into user design all led to greater effectiveness
  • Barriers: In one study, training was required during overtime on nights and weekends. In the early system which used a mainframe computer, system failures frustrated users and led to required overtime. Another system was built from donated equipment that ran slowly.
  • Healthcare Utilization: In one study, the mean length of stay decreased from 115 days to 99 days for patients with quadriplegia and 109 days to 79 days for paaplegic patients.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: 7 of 13 included studies reported an improvement in interdepartmental communication. Clinical staff had a more comprehensive picture of the patients' status so treatment plans were more appropriate.
  • Changes in efficiency and productivity: 11 of the 13 included studies report that the EHR improved efficiency. EHRs were superior to previous methods in storing, processing, and retrieving information. One study reported that documentation took 30% less time than handwritten notes.
  • Time needed to accrue benefit: Varied
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.