This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Authors
Thomas, H. V., Lewis, G., Watson, M., Bell, T., Lyons, I., Lloyd, K., Weich, S., Sharp, D.
Journal
Br J Gen Pract
Publication Date
2004 Nov
Volume
54
Issue
508
Pages
832-7
  • HIT Description: decision support Ð clinical guidelines / protocols More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of depression and anxiety in primary care
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: RCT
  • Outcomes: impact on patient satisfaction and health care effectiveness and quality
Summary:
  • Settings: Sample of patients from 5 general practices in Bristol and Cardiff scoring 3 or higher on a General Health Questionnaire screening instrument
  • Intervention: Patients scoring >= 12 on a computerized psychosocial assessment were randomized so that physicians of intervention patients received a computer-generated report with details of mental health issues and patient-specific treatment recommendations. Control patients received usual care with physician access to locally created guidelines.
  • Evaluation Method: Mailed questionnaires (general health questionnaire) to patients
  • Description: Computerized self-assessment
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Intervention patients had lower general health questionnaire scores at 6 weeks but the effect was not sustained at 6 months. There were no differences between groups in effect on recovery, quality of life or patient satisfaction.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.