This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Ethical issues and the electronic health record

Ethical issues (beneficence, autonomy, fidelity, and justice) related to electronic health records (EHRs) confront health personnel, health leaders, and health policy makers. EHRs are seen as beneficent because of alleged increased access to health care, but research has not consistently demonstrated access for disadvantaged persons. Autonomy is jeopardized when patients' health data are shared or linked without the patients' knowledge. Fidelity is breached by the exposure of thousands of patients' health data through mistakes or theft. Lack of confidence in the security of health data may induce patients to conceal sensitive information, and as a consequence, patients’ treatment may be compromised. Justice is breached when persons, because of their socioeconomic class or age, do not have equal access to health information resources and public health services. Health personnel, leaders, and policy makers should discuss the ethical implications of EHRs before the occurrence of conflicts among the ethical principles. Recommendations to guide health personnel, leaders, and policy makers are provided.

Author(s)
Layman EJ
Journal
Health Care Manag (Frederick)
Publication Year
2008
Publication Month
Apr-Jun
Volume
27
Issue
2
Page Number
165-76
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.