The studies referenced here were reported in peer-reviewed publications as systematic reviews, hypothesis tests, or predictive analyses. Although the results are valid for the institutions they represent, they may not be valid for other organizations with different technical capacities, project management expertise, organizational culture, or human and economic resources - all of which may affect cost. More
CPR can virtually eliminate the cost of coding time, resulting in a saving of $5100/yr
This can be used to make a case to management for implementation of an EHR. The second article (although in Sweden) also provides perspective on EHR implementation in the outpatient setting but breaks down the cost by category:
Category
Description
Monetary value (in SEK, 1995 dollars)
Direct costs
Training
54,000
Hardware and software (NPV)
1,471,700
Project manager system supplier
6700
Maintenance
109700
Total direct costs
1,642,100
Unexpected costs
Self-training during working hours
109,100
Loss of normal activities in leisure hours
69,100
Increase in administrative work load
192,000
Extra service
3,300
Summarizing medical records
77,400
Total unexpected costs
450,900
The fifth article provides summary data for a small independent family physician clinc:
Settings: Hypothetical small independent family physician clinic.
Evaluation Method: Present an Excel-based spreadsheet tool designed to help family physicians compare the initial purchase price and the annual and five-year operating costs of EHR systems. Gave an example from a hypothetical scenario. A web link to the tool was provided.
Health IT System: Hypothetical electronic health records (EHR) systems for outpatient clinical settings.
Costs: In the example, the author estimated that an EHR system with one-server and six desktop- computers would cost $71, 020 initially (assuming purchased in Jan. 2002), $7,283 for first year, and $11, 984 for years two to five respectively. Description and comments of the cost items (e.g., type of printers) were provided.
The studies referenced here were reported in peer-reviewed publications as systematic reviews, hypothesis tests, or predictive analyses. Although the results are valid for the institutions they represent, they may not be valid for other organizations with different technical capacities, project management expertise, organizational culture, or human and economic resources - all of which may affect cost. In addition, these studies may not contain the full technical details of how health information technology was implemented or how it operates. Thus, these results are best used as general guidelines for determining costs and benefits rather than as absolutes, because they may not hold true for all organizations. Please refer to Chapter 4 of "Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology," AHRQ Publication No. 06-E006, for additional information on the limitations and conclusions of the studies included in the evidence report.