Veterans Administration (VA) Integrated Medication Manager
Utah
View Calendar Year Update, 2008 (
PDF,
HTML)
Abstract:
Because evaluation of most computerized decision support has been focused on whether the technology works, we still know little about why these systems succeed or fail. For instance, despite computerized reminders for hypertension management in one of the nation's largest healthcare systems, 22% of hypertensive patients in that system have not met basic blood pressure goals.
This project proposes to study a new technology called the Integrated Medication Manager. This application was developed using well-established theories of cognition, notably Hollnagel's Contextual Control Theory. It is designed to facilitate improved decision-making by helping clinicians to consider more relevant data and to better plan patient care. One of the major features of this system is the explicit linking of patient problems, therapies, and goals. This project will compare the new Integrated Medication Manager to the current version of the Veterans Administration's Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS).
Specific aims are:
Aim 1. Identify cognitive components of providers' therapeutic decision making in the field.
Aim 2. Refine and evaluate the Integrated Medication Manager using simulation studies.
Aim 2.a. Refine interfaces and logic of the Integrated Medication Manager.
Aim 2.b. Compare the performance of the Integrated Medication Manager and usual CPRS.
Aim 3. Implement and Evaluate the Integrated Medication Manager in a cluster-randomized trial.
Aim 3.a. Assess differences in surrogate clinical endpoints such as blood pressure versus usual CPRS
Aim 3.b Evaluate provider satisfaction and adoption
Nationally, 35% of hypertensive patients have not met basic blood pressure goals. We plan to evaluate a new intervention in terms of its effect on blood pressure. Decreasing blood pressure by 2% to 3% could decrease the risk of fatal cardiovascular disease and fatal MI by 25%, the risk of stroke by 6% to 12% and a 3% decrease in blood pressure could decrease the risk of heart failure by 10-20%.
Grant Number:R18 HS 017186
Category:Improving Quality through Clinician Use of Health IT (ASQ)
AHRQ Funded Amount:$594,582
Principal Investigator:Nebeker, Jonathan
Organization:Western Institute for Biomedical Research
City:Salt Lake City
State:Utah
Project End Date:Mar 31, 2010
Project Status:Ongoing
Project Categories
Type of Health Information Technology: Clinical Decision Support
Community: Non-rural
Care Setting: Primary care practices
Current as of September 2009
View Featured Outcomes
Project Title:Veterans Administration (VA) Integrated Medication Manager
Principal Investigator:Nebeker, Jonathan
Organization:Western Institute for Biomedical Research
Mechanism:RFA: HS07-006: Ambulatory Safety and Quality Program: Improving Quality through Clinician Use of Health IT (IQHIT)
Grant Number:R18 HS 017186
Project Period:09/07 - 03/10
AHRQ Funding Amount:$594,582
Summary Status as of:December 2008
Strategic Goal:Develop and disseminate health IT evidence and evidence-based tools to improve the quality and safety of medication management via the integration and utilization of medication management systems and technologies.
Business Goal:Implementation and Use
Summary:
This project was initiated in September 2007 and has completed the first third of the grant period. This project features the development and evaluation of a new health information technology (health IT) application called the Integrated Medication Manager (IMM). This application was developed using well-established theories of cognition, notably Hollnagel's Contextual Control Theory, and is designed to facilitate improved decisionmaking by helping clinicians to consider more relevant data, and to better plan patient care. One of the major features of this system is the explicit linking of patient problems, therapies, and goals. This project will compare the new IMM to the current version of the Veterans Administration's (VA) Computerized Patient Record System. This project focuses on generating new knowledge about medication management. The VA Office of Information and Technology is the primary organizer. The study occurs in three phases over 2 1/2 years. During the first year, mixed methods were used to elucidate the technology's socio-cognitive mechanisms of action. The preliminary findings of this phase were shared with the development team, who refined the software based on the findings. There is some modest overlap in the first-year studies and those begun subsequently. During the second year, the project will continue to analyze data from the first year and implement the software in a cluster-randomized trial. During the final 6 months, the clinical data will be analyzed.
In addition to the immediate aims that will be attained during the life of this grant, the project team plans to apply for funding for the following future aims: evaluate the impact of the IMM on team interactions and communication; evaluate the effect of the IMM on adverse drug events; implement and evaluate the effect of integrating patient-entered clinical information and goals through myHealtheVet, the VA patient Web portal; implement and evaluate rich, condition-specific decision support for hypertension and other conditions; evaluate the IMM as a tool for continuous medication reconciliation; and evaluate the cost, cost effectiveness, and cost benefit of the IMM and related systems.
Specific Aims:
- Identify cognitive components of providers' therapeutic decisionmaking in the field. (Upcoming)
- Refine and evaluate the IMM using simulation studies. (Upcoming)
- Implement and evaluate the IMM in a cluster-randomized trial. (Ongoing)
2008 Activities:The process of working with standards committees in the VA to apply knowledge representations such as National Drug File Reference Terminology, which links drug ingredients to indications and adverse effects, was completed, along with the construction of compact representations for use in testing. Identification of cognitive components of providers' therapeutic decisionmaking in the field was completed and pilot data was collected. The computerized data collection tools were finalized and are in use. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was previously obtained for the first two aims listed above for some sites; however, the remaining two sites for the first aim are within the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, where a moratorium was placed on all research currently being conducted or pending approval. Thus, IRB approval will be pending until they lift restrictions and grant approval for the study. The project hopes to receive approval in year two quarter two, but has no definite timeline for when approval will be granted. Data collection at one of the five sites has been collected with the target of collecting data from two additional sites by quarter two of year two still on track.
Preliminary Impact and Findings:The project has no findings to report at this time.
Selected Outputs:
AHRQ 2008 Annual Conference presentation: Human Factors in Prescription Medication Management (PowerPoint File, 1.2 MB; Web Version).
AHRQ 2008 Annual Conference presentation: Information Integration to Support Medication Management (PowerPoint File, 2.1 MB; Web Version).
Grantee's Most Recent Self-Reported Quarterly Status:The project is mostly on track with 80 to 99 percent of its milestones and is generally on time.
Milestones:Progress is mostly on track.
Budget:Spending is roughly on target.