Below is a collection of peer-reviewed resources on Personal Health Records (PHRs). These resources were selected and reviewed by experts in PHR development and usage, and they represent the best known evidence on the benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with PHR use in transforming health care.
Summaries of each item are provided in addition to a link for users to access the full resource. Where possible the National Resource Center has attempted to select resources that are freely available in the public domain. However, some of the articles may require individual or institutional access.
1.
Early experiences with personal health records
Author(s): Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC
Source: J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-7.
Summary: Over the past year, several payers, employers, and commercial vendors have announced personal health record projects. Few of these are widely deployed and few are fully integrated into ambulatory or hospital-based electronic record systems. The earliest adopters of personal health records have many lessons learned that can inform these new initiatives. We present three case studies--MyChart at Palo Alto Medical Foundation, PatientSite at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Indivo at Children's Hospital Boston. We describe our implementation challenges from 1999 to 2007 and postulate the evolving challenges we will face over the next five years.
2.
Personal health records
Author(s): Kimmel Z, Greenes RA, Liederman E
Source: J Med Pract Manage 2005 Nov-Dec;21(3):147-52.
Summary: Nationwide, momentum is growing to provide patients with computer tools
called personal health records (PHRs). These allow patients to
participate in their own healthcare management by viewing, editing, or
discussing their own medical data. Historically, PHRs targeted
consumers, but contemporary PHRs are increasingly aimed at providers
and payers. This article reviews the types of PHRs that are currently
available, discusses the PHR functionalities that offer the best value
for a medical practice, and provides strategies for making purchasing
decisions.
3.
Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption
Author(s): Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ
Source: J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):121-6.
Summary: Recently there has been a remarkable upsurge in activity surrounding
the adoption of personal health record (PHR) systems for patients and
consumers. The biomedical literature does not yet adequately describe
the potential capabilities and utility of PHR systems. In addition, the
lack of a proven business case for widespread deployment hinders PHR
adoption. In a 2005 working symposium, the American Medical Informatics
Association's College of Medical Informatics discussed the issues
surrounding personal health record systems and developed
recommendations for PHR-promoting activities. Personal health record
systems are more than just static repositories for patient data; they
combine data, knowledge, and software tools, which help patients to
become active participants in their own care. When PHRs are integrated
with electronic health record systems, they provide greater benefits
than would stand-alone systems for consumers. This paper summarizes the
College Symposium discussions on PHR systems and provides definitions,
system characteristics, technical architectures, benefits, barriers to
adoption, and strategies for increasing adoption.
4.
Personal health records: empowering consumers
Author(s): Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS
Source: J Healthc Inf Manag 2007 Winter;21(1):76-86.
Summary: By empowering consumers, electronic personal health records (ePHRs,
more commonly PHRs) will play a key role in the evolving electronically
enabled health information environment. Consumers want to be more
engaged in their own healthcare and are seeking out information online.
Despite intense concerns about confidentiality and security, they have
high expectations for electronic health information. The growth of
patient self-management tools for remote monitoring will fuel PHR
adoption, if tools and standards are developed that make clinical
information understandable to and usable by consumers. The value of the
PHR will lie in shared information and shared decision-making, as its
components support the continuity of care. Efforts in other countries
can provide guidance in helping Americans do what they do best-develop
and use innovative technology to serve the American people.